Polar Capital: Some very smart
people work at Polar Capital, which has now been in existence since 2001.
However, there seems to be a loss of momentum, which somewhat takes the gloss
off the story just now. In the year to 31st March 2015 AuM fell from
$13.2bn to $12.3bn. Despite this core operating profits, excluding performance
fees, rose 13% to £27.7m, but pre-tax profits fell from £32.7m to £31.1m. This
was in part due to performance fees falling from £7.6m to £5.2m and an increase
in share based payments from £1.5m to £2.6m. Adjusted diluted eps likewise
slipped back from 29.04p to 28.12p. With £41.4m of net cash (down slightly YoY)
on the balance sheet, the group maintains a high payout ratio, with the
dividend set at an unchanged 25p. The drop in AuM was blamed on a partial
reversal of the previous year’s surge into the Japan fund, whose size dropped
from $5.5bn to $3.6bn, but was still their largest single vehicle. The group is
very proud of its focused fund range and specialisms, but a resultant weakness
is that the four largest (Technology Trust, Japan Fund, Healthcare
Opportunities and North American) account for $7.8bn or 63% of the group total.
In response, the group has pursued selective diversification in its fund range,
with new UK and European funds having been recently launched. Generally fund
performance remains very good, although a blip for the Japan fund contributed
to the fund outflows experienced.
Looking ahead, the group cites many of the concerns faced in the world
and by investors, whilst re-affirming their faith in stockpickers (Ed. yippee!). They hope that a
turnaround in their Japan fund flows will enable the growth seen elsewhere in
their range to show through, with an eventual capacity of $25bn for their
current range of funds mentioned. That is roughly double the current size, with
most of the cost already sunk. So the flow through to the bottom line would be
dramatic. In the shorter term, the outlook is rather more cloudy, with
consensus looking to a further slight dip in eps in FY2016. At 455p, 27p of eps
would be a PE of 16.8x and a maintained yield of 5.5% on a flat 25p dividend.
The eps can be moved around by the treatment of performance fees and any excess
capital, but the story of a group seeking renewed momentum from this short term
plateau remains. For the moment I would prefer to keep an eye on the AuM trend
(they had crept up to $12.bn at end-May), before charging into the shares, but
that big (and affordable) yield may make an earlier move worth considering. (Neil Cumming,
23rdJune 2015)
These comments are not a personal
recommendation to deal. Any investments can fall as well as rise in value, so
you could get back less than you invest. I may have a financial interest in
some of the stocks written about. www.dividendpower.co.uk or e-mail at info@dividendpower.co.uk Twitter: @DividendPower
No comments:
Post a Comment